“Education Reform” and the Destruction of Meaning

The Face of Education ReformErik Loomis wrote an article a while back, The Rheeist Scam Goes Global. It’s about Michelle Rhee and the whole “education reform” movement. But I was taken by the cartoon he used, which showed men building a charter school by taking away materials from a close-by public school. I have always thought of “education reform” in terms of intent: the destruction of teacher unions. But until I looked at the cartoon (which is not making this point), I had never really thought about what will be the result of “education reform.”

I think we should be clear about those leading the “education reform” movement. As Deep Throat says in All the President’s Men, “These are not very bright guys.” They know they want to destroy unions. They know they want to turn education into some kind of a factory process. But after that, it’s all faith. It’s like the old Sidney Harris cartoon where the second step in a proof is, “Then a miracle occurs.” That’s the “education reform” movement all over. Step 1: destroy education as we know it. Step 2: then a miracle occurs. Step 3: all people grow up well educated and healthy.

What “Education Reform” Working Would Mean

But let’s give all these reformers the benefit of the doubt. They will change education into employment skills training. And we don’t end up with Idiocracy (which is a tedious film). We end up with something that looks more like the B F Skinner dystopia. It would be like Modern Times but with everyone content doing their jobs because that’s all they would know. The search for meaning would be obsolete because everyone would know the meaning of their lives: to make the owners of Walmart rich.

But none of that would be so bad if it weren’t for the total disregard for everything educational outside what is useful for IBM and Apple.

It made me think of Babe: Pig in the City. More specifically: the most poignant scene in the film. It is when Babe and company free all the animals from the “jail.” Thelonius, the old orangutan, insists upon dressing before they leave, even though time is a factor. He has found a meaning in his life — and he’s too old to change. (He gets the best ending in the film, handing clothespins to Herself.) And I imagine myself that way at 80.

I suppose that all people feel this way to some extent as they grow older. But in general, things change for the better. “Education reform” is moving us in a rather worse direction — ignorantly, but quite deliberately. And for the most base of motives. I mean, who do you think is paying Jonathan Chait’s wife to “reform” education? It’s a bunch of super rich conservatives and neoliberals. How proud they must all be: destroying the very concept of childhood so that Microsoft and Facebook will have a well-trained workforce. It keeps wages down too!

Trivial Meaning

But none of that would be so bad if it weren’t for the total disregard for everything educational outside what is useful for IBM and Apple. You could force children to learn Scratch and still give them time to escape in literature and music and mud pie creation. Instead, what I see is 6 hours of school and 3 hours of mind-numbing homework. No time for novel reading, because reading is meant for technical manuals.

It isn’t like the meaning I find in life is perfect. It is distinctly imperfect and incomplete. But at least I know it is worth the search. I don’t like the idea of being my own version of Thelonius — stupidly looking for meaning when the product of decades of “education reform” has trained society to get with the program and sing the company song.

This entry was posted in Politics by Frank Moraes. Bookmark the permalink.

About Frank Moraes

Frank Moraes is a freelance writer and editor online and in print. He is educated as a scientist with a PhD in Atmospheric Physics. He has worked in climate science, remote sensing, throughout the computer industry, and as a college physics instructor. Find out more at About Frank Moraes.

7 thoughts on ““Education Reform” and the Destruction of Meaning

    • I’m a great admirer of Alfie Kohn. I think I’ve read that, but I’ll check it out again tomorrow. Thanks!

  1. I am glad someone else doesn’t like Idiocracy. I always thought it was a terrible film despite understanding the basic idea.

    Now this is where you say you don’t actually dislike it.

    Anyway, about the education reform-people have been claiming that schools are factories for ages now.: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2015/10/10/american-schools-are-modeled-after-factories-and-treat-students-like-widgets-right-wrong/

    But honestly, I have a difficult time assuming we shouldn’t be teaching students how to eventually get a job. Do we need to get rid of homework? Yes. Do we also need to spend six hours teaching students things that let them navigate the world they will eventually be inhabiting? Yes.

    • No. I really do dislike the film. That’s not to say that it doesn’t have its moments. But it doesn’t ultimately work. It’s satire for dim people.

      I really do believe that education should be about giving children a good childhood. “Job skills” are ridiculously simple to learn if one has a good foundation of knowledge and a love of learning. Our entire model of education is wrong.

      • Oh good on the film.

        As for education giving kids a good childhood-that is what parents are for. :P

        • Ha! Good one.

          But seriously, parents ought to be. Even still, an education is generally something that should be contracted out. And this is why all these conservatives and neoliberals who claim to be in favor of “equality of opportunity” should be for funding public education at the same level as the best private school. But they aren’t. And that is why rich children are introduced to Homer and Jung and Goedel, while poor children are introduced to “business reading” and multiplication tables and history as date memorization.

          It’s a glorious fact that providing a fun education is also good for the children’s long-term economic prospects and for the prospects of the economy as a whole. But education has always been about marking class lines. And for many education “reformers,” this is a good thing.

        • I like the opening two minutes, with the bright couple worrying about having kids and the dumb couple screaming at each other. And the little family-tree graphic that went along with it. I didn’t watch more than five minutes of the rest.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *