Michael Gerson Wants a Torturer, Not Someone Who Just Talks About It

Michael GersonI don’t think of myself as someone who scoffs at people. But it’s gotten pretty hard not to do a whole lot of scoffing at the Republican establishment as it grapples with the rise of Donald Trump. And that brings me to Michael Gerson’s column in The Washington Post last week, What Are Anti-Trump Republicans To Do? Here Are Four Options. It’s pathetic in so many ways, but the blunt stupidity is this: it doesn’t mention the one thing that the anti-Trump Republicans have consistently said they will do: support Trump. And we know Republicans: they will support Trump because it is axiomatic: anyone calling themselves a Republican is better than anyone calling themselves a Democrat.

But I was most taken with his idea of getting a representative of “civil rights Republicanism” to run as a third party candidate. Who are these rare creatures that make up so much of the Republican Party? You would think that if there were even a decent number of them, there would have been a presidential candidate to represent them. You know: like Bernie Sanders came into the Democratic nominating contest because there were a lot of liberal (and even socialist) Democrats? But not one person decided to go after this brand of Republican — probably because it is largely or completely a myth.

That’s not to say that Michael Gerson doesn’t have a candidate in mind. It’s the candidate that all Republicans keep in their back pockets to fight off the charge of racism and sexism: Condoleezza Rice. She’s black! She’s a woman! She’s a Republican! The Republican Party is therefore not a grand bastion of hatred and ignorance used in support of the rich and powerful. No, Condoleezza Rice proves that isn’t the case because, after all, she was a powerful member of a Republican administration that’s sole claim to (positive) fame is that the week after 9/11, George W Bush didn’t set up concentration camps for every American Muslim.

But most of the things that Trump has said that have so outraged the likes of Michael Gerson are a good deal less horrible than things Michael Gerson’s old boss and his mythic civil rights Republican Condoleezza Rice actually did.

Note that Michael Gerson was part of that very same civil rights loving administration. That’s the same administration that brought back systemic torture to our federal government. And what did Michael Gerson have to say about that? He said that an explicit ban on torture (which was a bi-partisan thing as recently as 1988 under Ronald Reagan) might be admirable, “But holding this view is not an option for those in government…” Because, you know, you can defeat the Nazis without torture, but not any old threat that comes along today that the Republican Party can demagogue!

Of course, Michael Gerson isn’t proposing himself as this civil rights Republican who will save us all. I’m all in favor of saints without being one. The problem is that Condoleezza Rice supports torture too. So it turns out, she’s just an African American woman who happens to be your typical Republican. As I recall, that includes being incompetent at both her jobs in the Bush White House, but that is a subject for another day.

I’ve picked torture because it is the most obvious example of the Republican Party’s lack of commitment to civil rights. It’s not that I’m unaware of what Michael Gerson is really getting at: he wants a Republican who will talk like civil rights were fixed in 1965. This is a game that people in the Republican establishment like to play. They like to pretend that they are high minded. They are all Edmund Burke in their minds. (Not that Burke was ultimately anything but an apologist for the power elite.)

But most of the things that Trump has said that have so outraged the likes of Michael Gerson are a good deal less horrible than things Michael Gerson’s old boss and his mythic civil rights Republican Condoleezza Rice actually did. As Glenn Greenwald noted yesterday in a brilliant article, Trump is gauche, but not in any categorical way worse than the Republican establishment (and much of the Democratic establishment too). I thought this was particularly apt:

What establishment mavens most resent is not what Trump is, does, or says, but what he reflects: the unmistakable, undeniable signs of late-stage imperial collapse, along with the resentments and hatreds they have long deliberately and self-servingly stoked but which are now raging out of their control.

Yes, Michael Gerson thinks it would be better to support people who actually ordered torture than to support a man who talks about it in such an open and vulgar manner. The truth is that the only thing that separates these supposed civil rights Republicans and the bigots who support Trump is style. It would seem that if the Republicans are to become the party of “civil rights,” all they have to do is send about half their voters to finishing school.

This entry was posted in Politics by Frank Moraes. Bookmark the permalink.
Avatar

About Frank Moraes

Frank Moraes is a freelance writer and editor online and in print. He is educated as a scientist with a PhD in Atmospheric Physics. He has worked in climate science, remote sensing, throughout the computer industry, and as a college physics instructor. Find out more at About Frank Moraes.

7 thoughts on “Michael Gerson Wants a Torturer, Not Someone Who Just Talks About It

  1. Hey now, George Bush once gave a speech that had a decent immigration policy in it. So you know, there was two whole good things out of that entire eight years of horribleness.

    I think they worry that the grifting gravy trail will end if the voters no longer need to have “wink wink” from the party candidates.

    • You know, it might be as simple as that. Sheer theft. Our missile defense system doesn’t just not work, it not works for millions of dollars every year, and subcontractors hold annual conventions. I am not remotely making this shit up, you can get the 2016 convention info right here: https://smdsymposium.org/

      Being a criminal is apparently quite lucrative.

    • I don’t remember the specifics of his immigration reform plan. But let’s not kid ourselves: it was because that was what the business community wanted. His immigration policy was based on the same thing his Social Security privatization scheme was. The thing is, immigration is a great thing for the economy all else equal. The problem is, when you live in the country where all the rewards of increased productivity go to the top, who cares about an improved economy?

      • @Frank: There is a reason gas hit almost five dollars a gallon. I was mainly making a joke about how bad it was.

        @James: I was referring to the way that Carson’s campaign seemed to be a get rich quick scheme. Along with the myriad of other rip offs the Republicans play on their base.

        • I thought my comment might have come off as critical. It was just reflexive annoyance at the incompetence of the Bush administration.

  2. Greenwald is such a national treasure (yes, I know he isn’t a US citizen and doesn’t live here. He’s still a treasure.)

    The phony outrage over Trump’s outrageousness is the worst kind of GOP dingbattery. Racism, xenophobia, and, above all, sadism are acceptable if they aren’t stated clearly. You can have a thousand points of bullshit, and that’s OK; you aren’t supposed to run as an open fascist.

    • I think Greenwald is still a citizen. He just doesn’t live here. But I could be wrong.

      As for Trump: it is all about keeping up appearances. There are so many things about America that are like a dysfunctional family. One of them is that a good third of the country are full out authoritarians, but we must never talk about it!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *