Ultimately Obama Will Be Judged on the Economy

Obama HopeJonathan Chait has published a nice little pick-me-up for discouraged Democrats, Obama Promised to Do 4 Big Things As President. Now He’s Done Them All. The four big things are: economic recovery, healthcare reform, climate change, and education reform. Barring the courts interfering with the new power plant regulations, he has done major things on all of these.

Chait rightly points out that one can complain that he didn’t do enough (if you’re on the left) or he did the wrong things (if you’re crazy). But you can’t deny that he has accomplished a lot. The “hapless mediocrity” meme on the right ought to be dead. And I’ll go further than Chait in one way, I think that Obama did all this despite more resistance than any president has ever faced. So yeah, Dodd-Frank is a really weak law and not even close to what we need. But given the Congress that he had, we should be impressed with what we did get.

There’s one thing that I disagree with Chait about, “What’s no longer possible is to imagine that historians will look back at Obama’s presidency and conclude not much got done.” He’s basing that statement on the fact that Obama did what he said he was going to do. But that isn’t how presidents are judged. To be honest, the way historians judge presidents are no less fickle than the way the people judge them. The only difference is that historians have a longer list of presidents to judge.

And how do the people judge presidents? On one thing: how the economy was when they left office. And in that regard, I think that Obama will do okay. But he won’t be remembered like Reagan and Clinton are remembered. They are both remembered well because the economy had been struggling when they came into office and it took off midway through their presidencies. The fact that neither president really deserves any credit for this—that it was was just dumb luck—doesn’t really matter. If the economy continues to improve, Obama will be remembered for that. Otherwise, I don’t think it much matters.

Think about Richard Nixon. I know he’s a special case, but the man did start the EPA. Do normal people even know that? Is he given much credit for it? I know that Obamacare is a big deal, but the way the law was created, it was designed to not seem like a law at all. More people will get Medicaid. Most won’t know whether they would have qualified before or not. The exchanges and the subsidies will just become part of what everyone does and no one will think about it. Healthcare inflation has been reduced? Hooray! That means once Republicans get back into power, they will have more money to waste on tax cuts for the rich and their beloved crony capitalism.

In the end, Obama will be judged on the economy. And there really were things that he could have done to make things a lot better. But to do that, he needed a willing partner in Congress. He didn’t have that, even when Congress was controlled by the Democrats. And I’m not sure Obama himself understood the economic situation correctly. So if the economy continues to improve, history will say he was a pretty good president—maybe even a damned good president. But just like with Reagan and Clinton before him, it won’t actually say anything about him.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized by Frank Moraes. Bookmark the permalink.
Avatar

About Frank Moraes

Frank Moraes is a freelance writer and editor online and in print. He is educated as a scientist with a PhD in Atmospheric Physics. He has worked in climate science, remote sensing, throughout the computer industry, and as a college physics instructor. Find out more at About Frank Moraes.

3 thoughts on “Ultimately Obama Will Be Judged on the Economy

  1. The rather extreme wealth disparity in the US has become evident from the beginning of the Obama presidency, and the growth in that disparity has been historically rapid. Ultimately, that may be what is Presidency is most remembered for in decades to come.

  2. @andrew markoff – I doubt that, given the history of the rise of income inequality started in the middle of the Carter years. But I agree that history will look down on both Clinton and Obama and how the DLC push the party to the far right on economic issues. It has long been my contention that the Republicans have gotten so crazy because the Democrats moved to the right. Without a counter-balance, there was nowhere for them to go other than where they are.

  3. One more thing Nixon did — he reduced government spending on a lot of R&D, especially at NASA — which, no, didn’t please me then or now — but he sort of made up for shifting federal R&D in the direction of biology and health care. Granted, he was hoping to wipe out cancer, and that hasn’t happened. But it did move the frontiers of health care far from the realms they’d been in. You might say it gave us a ten year jump on fighting AIDS, but that’s probably less than true — it might have taken till the 1990s to recognize AIDS if the old system had been left in effect.

    Something else to thank Nixon for, now he’s safely dead and planted.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *