The Rich Are Supposed to Be Evil

Paul KrugmanPaul Krugman has long argued that the reason the rich will brook no public criticism has to do with the needs hierarchy. Since they have everything that money can buy, they’ve moved beyond that. Now their need is to have all the nation worship them as demigods for their brilliant successes. He wrote about this today, Plutocrats Feeling Persecuted. I think there is much to this. But the issue is more fundamental than this.

Last year, I reported on a study by sociologist Paul Piff. He had kids play the board game Monopoly with special rules. As I wrote, “Instead of giving players an equal start, he defined players as either rich or poor. The rich player received three times the usual starting cash. The poor player received half the usual starting cash, got half as much money for passing go, and had to roll one die instead of the usual two. Obviously, the poor player lost—and quickly.” There is nothing especially surprising about that. But what happened was that the rich players came to see themselves as deserving of their special status. For example, the rich players were far less likely to cut the other player any slack and showed feelings of schadenfreude.

This is quite natural. People tend to think that they are entitled to whatever they are used to having. I’ll give you an example of this. I have a friend who has rented a house for a couple of decades. Last year, his landlord raised his rent 50%. He thought this was totally unfair. But in fact, his landlord had not raised his rent in ten years. If his landlord had raised his rent only 4.2% per year, it would have been at the new rent level, plus he would have been paying higher rent for the previous ten years. But none of that really mattered to him because he felt that what he was paying was the amount he was entitled to. The sudden rent increase shattered that fantasy.

1%The rich are like all of us in that they come up with ways to justify living better than others. But they have a lot more work to do because the nature of our economic system is to intensify inequality. If two people invent something at the same time, the one who gets the patent first can go on to be a billionaire, whereas the other gets nothing. And over time, these kinds of disparities only grow. For example, because he was rich and well connected, Bono got to invest in Facebook early and so made about a billion dollars. His children will inherit his money in addition to all the other advantages that come from being Bono’s child. Wealth accumulates over generations. (This isn’t to put down Bono, who seems like a decent guy—especially compared to other billionaires.)

As a result of this, the rich need to do some heavy duty justifying. This is where we get the myth of the Job Creator. The little people just spend money but the rich create jobs. Thus, in their own minds, they take on the responsibilities of the government. What need is there for social programs when these great Job Creators are doing God’s work by caring for the poor? And this leads to a feeling that anything the government does to reduce their wealth is evil because it gets in the way of their own program of Good Works like yacht buying.

But as I said, this is completely normal. I don’t expect the rich to behave any differently. Similarly, I don’t expect corporations to work for the public good as others do. These people and institutions do what is best for themselves. And that’s how the whole capitalist system is set up to work. It is wrong to expect anything different. What we need, then, is a strong government that stops the rich from getting too rich and corporations from getting too big. Because once that happens, we see what we have today: a system where the wealthy manipulate the government. And what they do is make the already unfair “winner take all” capitalist system even less fair.

So the question is not, “Why are the rich so awful?” It is, “How did we allow the rich to get so powerful?” And going forward, we have the even more important question: what are we going to do to reverse this?

This entry was posted in Uncategorized by Frank Moraes. Bookmark the permalink.
Avatar

About Frank Moraes

Frank Moraes is a freelance writer and editor online and in print. He is educated as a scientist with a PhD in Atmospheric Physics. He has worked in climate science, remote sensing, throughout the computer industry, and as a college physics instructor. Find out more at About Frank Moraes.

0 thoughts on “The Rich Are Supposed to Be Evil

  1. There is a wickedly clever little book by Irish journalist Harry Browne called "The Frontman: Bono (In The Name Of Power)". A descriptive "Guardian" review is here:

    http://www.theguardian.com/books/2013/jun/26/frontman-bono-harry-browne-review

    Browne’s book is well-divided into sections, so anyone curious about U2’s politics in their music (decidedly not leftist, BTW) can read about that. What might be most interesting to you or readers here are the other sections describing Bono’s celebrity activism.

    Browne’s not a hatchet man; the book is not a personal attack. I found it an eye-opening glimpse into how the super-rich with charitable instincts approach helping the poor. They rarely do anything so mundane as, you know, building a hospital or funding a school. No; they have TED conferences and Davos meetings where they explore Big Ideas about using the market to better the world. (The market consistently fails to deliver, but our intrepid heroes keep trying!) Poor Bono comes off as a nice man who is also a colossal egotist and fool (which will not surprise those familiar with U2’s music.)

    The almost religious belief that many rich people profess in the system’s intrinsic goodness (and, as the less humble of them will attest, their inherent goodness) does not strike me as mere propaganda. I think they believe this. I think they NEED to believe this. Like Michael Corleone needed to believe that destroying his family was all for the sake of his family. There’s a subconscious awareness of injustice at play, or at least a conscious awareness that others do not regard them as vital contributors to the welfare of humankind in the way they regard themselves. They’re quite insecure about it. It’s rather tiring to read/listen to, really.

    Your friend renting the house is less deluded than the average wealthy "philanthropist," I imagine. Also any landlord, anywhere, can bite my shiny metal ass.

  2. @JMF – I remember hearing Michael Medved once talking about why he thought stars in Hollywood were so liberal. He said it was because they knew that they had done little to get their wealth–they knew it was mostly luck–and so they felt insecure about it. I think that’s a brilliant observation. But somehow he can’t seem to apply it to winners in other areas of our market economy. Why is it that the Koch brothers are so conservative when they all [i]inherited[/i] their money? It’s all sociological, of course. People believe what those around them believe. And there has been a trend in business for some time. The idea that "greed is good" is what motivates them. This idea is perhaps the most damaging idea in our society.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *