Lincoln Star Thaddeus Stevens

Lincoln 2012As I reported before, last weekend, I went to see Lincoln. It was a surprisingly good film. My only real problem with it is that the ending doesn’t particularly work. Or perhaps more accurately, the film goes on too long. It is, after all, about the passage of the 13th Amendment. (In fact, I thought that the title 13th would have been better than Lincoln.) The truth is that although Lincoln is very important in the film, the story is not specifically about him.

The character who most stands out is then Speaker of the House, Thaddeus Stevens. He is one of these men who pepper American history by being so far ahead of their times that they would be considered radical today. My favorite example is Thomas Paine—the atheistic socialist who is probably more important to the founding of this country than any other single man. Stevens was equally radical. Many of their beliefs would today be dismissed as non-starters—just as they were in his own time.

I’m inclined not to tell you too much about the man, because I think everyone should go out and see the movie. I don’t want to ruin any of the film’s twists and turns. But to give you some idea of the main, here is a bit from Wikipedia:

Stevens dreamed of a socially just world, where unearned privilege did not exist. He believed from his personal experience that being different or having a different perspective can enrich society. He believed that differences among people should not be feared or oppressed but celebrated.

All that stuff about equality and justice would certainly put him well to the left of President Obama, just as it did so 150 years ago under President Lincoln.

Since his death, most portrayals of Stevens have not been kind. This is not just in things like D. W. Griffith’s racist visual screed The Birth of a Nation. Historians have generally portrayed him as kind of an arrogant asshole who wanted to stick it to the south. To a large extent, I can’t blame the man. When you are on the right side of one the greatest wrongs of your nation, I think a bit of arrogance is forgivable. And if I had been around at the time, I’m not sure I would ever have been able to forgive the south.

But I don’t know that much about him. I just got Hans L. Trefousse’s Thaddeus Stevens: Nineteenth-Century Egalitarian. I’m very much looking forward to the book. Lincoln has always been kind of a disappointment as a hero. Although enlightened by the mores of his time, he was still a racist. His proposal to create a South American colony for former slaves still strikes me as vile. Just the same, I expect to find Stevens more of a mixed bag than Paine. While Paine never had the curse of power to soil his character, I’m afraid that Stevens did. But I’ve never expected perfection from my heroes.

Again: go see Lincoln; it will be good for your soul. The film has four intertwined stories that would all be worthy of their own books. The story of Thaddeus Stevens is but one.


Here is Tommy Lee Jones as Thaddeus Stevens:

This entry was posted in Uncategorized by Frank Moraes. Bookmark the permalink.

About Frank Moraes

Frank Moraes is a freelance writer and editor online and in print. He is educated as a scientist with a PhD in Atmospheric Physics. He has worked in climate science, remote sensing, throughout the computer industry, and as a college physics instructor. Find out more at About Frank Moraes.

0 thoughts on “Lincoln Star Thaddeus Stevens

  1. @Mack – Thanks for the link. In general, I stay up on Robin’s blog, but I’ve been busy with another project. I think he makes excellent points and I mostly agree.

    One thing he didn’t mention was how Mary’s servant–like all the blacks in the later half of the film–was so grateful. It may well be historically accurate, but I found it kind of hard to take.

    As to the whole argument, I think it shows quite a lot of ignorance about how films are actually made. The problem with Spielberg is that his storytelling is wedded to the romantic hero. He has a hard time telling a story without one, even when constrained by history. In his defense, [i]Amistad[/i] manages to do what Robin requests.

  2. Yeah, I’ve seen your comments on some of his articles, and you’ve mentioned him here before, so I knew that you followed him to some degree.

    As for his points – and yours – I have not seen [i]Lincoln[/i] yet, so I really don’t have anything to add at this time. I really wish I would’ve watched the film before reading anyone’s comments on it. I normally don’t like to read reviews before watching a movie, and not just because of the spoilers. But I plan on going to see it with my dad sometime before it leaves theaters.

  3. @Mack – I do recommend seeing it in the theater. It is rather dark and won’t transfer to TV all that well.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *