Frances Brooke

Frances BrookeOn this day in 1724, the great writer Frances Brooke was born. She was a successful English novelist, although she wrote a few plays as well. Her husband was a military chaplain, stationed for a time in Canada. As a result of this, Brooke ended up writing the first novel written in that country, The History of Emily Montague. And it is this novel that I want to discuss.

The History of Emily Montague was an epistolary novel. I haven’t read it. To be honest, I’m not that fond of the genre. But according to Wikipedia, the novel was used as an example of the the hyperbolic use of the word “literally” in the original Oxford English Dictionary. The sentence was, “He is a fortunate man to be introduced to such a party of fine women at his arrival; it is literally to feed among the lilies.” And this gives me an excuse to attack grammar snobs.

Many people go crazy when others use the word “literally” to mean “figuratively.” So after hearing the sentence above, the grammar snob will say, “It isn’t literally like feeding among the lilies — it’s figuratively!” But grammar is descriptive, not definitional. The time to have the fight about this was at least 250 years ago. Clearly, Brooke knew what she was doing. When she used “literally” as “figuratively” in the novel — two times — she italicized the words after it. She seems to have meant to be commenting on how the language was used by certain people of that time. It was clearly quite common even then.

So grammar snobs, get over yourselves! If Frances Brooke could make gentle fun of this grammatical silliness 250 years ago, you can at least do the same today. You aren’t impressing anyone with your knowledge. You’re just saying, “When I was in fifth grade, my teacher told me this!” And you don’t want to look that pathetic.

Happy birthday Frances Brooke!

1 thought on “Frances Brooke

  1. Turns out, Ian Kilmister’s daddy was a military chaplain as well. Cannot possibly be a coincidence amirite?

    The hyperbolic use of ‘literal’ is not a grammar error. It is a lazy, self-centred way to draw attention to your own speech and ideas. Keeping in mind that there is a lot more media to consume than in Ms. Brooke’s day, using ‘literal’ for that which is figurative is sure to complicate the fundamentally easy distinction between figurative and literal speech. You, Frank, very frequently write about problems caused by the loss of a sense of reality both in the citizenry and the elites of the USA. So this is no idle complaint.

    Hey guy! Instead of saying ‘he literally talked my ear off’, why not say ‘he talked at me until I felt like my ear would fall off’? Smarter. More interesting. More personal. More feeling. Better; a rare case in which longer is better.

    The Colts’ defence literally laughed in Peyton Manning’s face yesterday!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *